Aryaadan Muhammed's speech

Aryaadan Muhammed's speech

 

Sri. Aryadan Muhammad ( Minister of Power and Transport, INC MLA from Nilambur ) speaking at the Hindu  Sammelan held on 21^st May 2013, at the Putharikandam Maithan, Trivandrum, Kerala. He was inaugurating the session on 'National Security'.

 

When I was invited to this Ananthapuri Hindu Maha Sammelan, I accepted the invitation without hesitation. The reason for this is twofold. The main reason for accepting the invitation is the respect I have for the Hindu religion and the Hindus. I believe that Hindu religion is something which stands against divisiveness – divisiveness based on caste, community and religion. We all know that Hinduism was the first religion in India. In fact if someone asks when the Hindu religion came into being, the answer would be that Hindu religion came into being when India came into being.

Another reason for me to accept this invitation is that, I personally have a relationship with Hinduism. My father's father's father's father's father was a Hindu. Everybody knows this. At the onset, there were only Hindus in India. That was so for thousands of years after India came into being. It was because of the tolerance of Hindu religion that other religions established themselves here. It was just 1400 years back, in the 8^th century, that Muslims came here. Before that there were only Hindus in India. It was in AD 52 that the Christians came to India. At that time St. Thomas came to India. And the belief is that he planted 7 and a halfCrosses here. And one half of that cross was searched for at Nilakkal. All these developments took place in recent times. So who is the father's father's father'sfather of the Christians ? It is a Hindu. You should have no doubt about that. So, I have a relationship with Hindu religion. Every Indian has a relationship with Hindu religion. I don't see this religion as being similar to other religions. As Swami Vivekananda said, it is a way of life. It is a culture. It is not a religion like Islam. Not like Christianity. If it was so, there would not be another religion in India. On the other hand till recently there was a flow of converts to Buddhism from Hinduism. This flow of converts was stopped by Sri Shankaracharya's ' Advaitasidhanta'. We can see Buddhists all over the world and in China. It was a religion which evolved from Hindu religion, from India. It was Sankaracharya's Advaitaprinciple which strengthened the Hindu religion and held it together as it is today.

I know there might be so criticism regarding me coming here, I have always swum against the tide. I have not been defeated yet.

I have come here also because it was my duty to do so. Hindu religion should not perish in this country. It should survive in this country. Hindu religion is the religion of this country. This can be accepted by everyone. Not only that, I have no doubt that Hindu religion is rooted in the concept of tolerance. One should not forget that it was the Hindu kings who welcomed St. Thomas in AD 52 and allowed them freedom to convert. Likewise when the Muslims came over here, it was the King- the Zamorine, who welcomed them and even gave them a separate title-name. This would never have happened if the religion here was anything other than Hinduism. That is why I say that, the people of India cannot and should never forget Hinduism. It would not be right to do so. This is all I have to say. I once again acknowledge the Hindu religion which is based on the principle of Advaita, the principle based on unity, as being responsible for the peace and tranquility in this country and express my wish that it remains so in the country for all time.

This is a program on national security and in this occasion I have to say that thesection which can ensure this security are the Hindus who have maximum allegiance towards this nation. The political formation which is most interested in the integrity of the country is the Congress and the people who aid them in this endeavor are the Hindus. The BJP also stands for national integrity like the congress. There is no doubt about it. Also, the survival of this nation is essential for world peace.

                                                                                           

संघ शिक्षा वर्ग, प्रथम वर्ष - गुजरात

Dr subramanyam swami on Kashmir

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY IN KASHMIR -

SOME PICTURES AND PRESS CUTTINGS

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                     DIVERSITY-USA

                                                                    (A NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC THINK TANK ON MINORITY ISSUES)

                                                                            3143 Gilbert Ave., Roseburg, OR (USA)

                                                                                 Phone & Fax 1-541-957-8414

 

                                 J&K AN INTEGRAL PART OF INDIA

                   NO DIALOGUE WITH PAKISTAN ON KASHMIR

                    PLEBISCITE NEHRU'S PERSONAL IDEA NOT INDIA'S PROMISE

                WE ARE READY TO WAGE WAR AGAINST PAK. TO LIBERATE PoK

                                                                        Dr. Subramanian Swamy in Kashmir

 

     For the first time after Dr. Shyama Prasad Mookerjee was killed in a Kashmir jail during Sheikh Abdullah's reign an Indian stalwart confronted the nation particularly the people of Kashmir last week in a straight talk with the reality of the Kashmir situation.  Thus boldly  advised Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President of the Janata Party,  the people of Kashmir that they should forget about Pakistan and live like true Indians. Disregarding the presence of terrorist, separatist, Islamist and militants and trouble makers Dr. Swamy declared that Kashmir is an integral part of India and that reality will never change.   

 

    Kashmir problem is Jawaharlal Nehru's special gift to India but it won't be allowed to change the ever lasting relationship between Srinagar and New Delhi declared Dr. Subramanian Swamy, addressing a crowded press conference in Srinagar.

 

NO COMPROMISE ON KASHMIR:   

 

        Dr. Sway advised  Kashmiris to forget about Pakistan and live like true Indians. India will stay here for ever since historically Kashmir is an integral part of India.  Even during the modern times the accession of the state with the rest of the country ratified this irrefutable fact. Under no circumstances will India compromise on Kashmir he assured his audience.

 

WE ARE READY TO WAGE WAR TO LIBERATE POK:

 

    Without mincing words he told the nation that Kashmir is India and we have every intention of taking back the Pakistan occupied part of Kashmir as that occupation has been illegal from day one. To achieve that goal we are ready to wage a war against Pakistan the Janata Party chief said.

 

    Dr. Swamy declared that NDA will form the next government in the country and the Janata Party will be an ally of that Govt. " We will ask the NDA Govt. to reconsider its policy on Kashmir".

 

NO TALKS WITH PAK. ON KASHMIR: 

 

    What Nehru and Vajpayee did  about Kashmir is history. From now on there will be no talks on Kashmir with Pakistan.

 

    Kashmir is not a dispute so there should be no talks on it. It is only a question of removing the illegal occupation by a neighboring state which does not know how to maintain good neighborly relations with us.

 

    Kashmir is a part of India and of all the people Kashmiris should understand it well without any misgivings. Those who tell you otherwise are misleading you.

 

    NEHRU TOOK KASHMIR TO UN WITHOUT AUTHORITY:

    PLEBISCITE NEHRU'S IDEA NOT INDIA'S PROMISE:

 

    Acting unilaterally, even without taking the Indian Cabinet in to confidence, Jawaharlal Nehru took the Kashmir issue to the United Nations where plebiscite was born.  So those people seeking plebiscite should contact Nehru not India for this purpose.

 

    Swamy however, favored dialogue with China saying that talks between India and China involved border dispute and not Kashmir issue.

 

    He told Pakistan to take care of its own provinces such as Baluchistan and stop interfering in the internal affairs of India.

 

    He asked the people of Kashmir to compare the progress made in J&K as against the PoK which was forcibly occupied by Islamabad. That should open your eyes and expose the reality of Pakistan.

 

Some of the headlines in the coverage of Dr. Swamy's straight talk  in the English and vernacular media of Kashmir included:

 

KASHMIR IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF INDIA         

ACCESSION OF J&K WITH INDIA IS FULL AND FINAL

 

NEHRU NEVER DISCUSSED THE PLEBISCITE ISSUE IN THE INDIAN CABINET. IT SIMPLY WAS HIS PERSONAL IDEA AND NOT A PROMISE BY INDIA

 

J&K AND PoK ARE INTEGRAL PART OF INDIA

 

INDIA SHOULD NOT HAVE NAY DIALOGUE WITH PAKISTAN ON KASHMIR

 

IN TIMES OF PEACE JANATA PARTY THREATENS ALL OUT WAR WITH PAKISTAN

 

NO DIALOGUE WITH PAKISTAN BUT WAR

 

        Some of the cuttings of Dr. Swamy's coverage in Kashmir are forwarded with this item for your perusal.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<fin.jpg>

<IMG_0001.jpg>

<IMG_0003.jpg>

<IMG_0005.jpg>

<IMG_0007.jpg>

<IMG_0009.jpg>

<IMG_0010.jpg>

<IMG_0011.jpg>

<IMG_0012.jpg>

<IMG_0013.jpg>

<IMG_0015.jpg>

<IMG_0016.jpg>

<IMG_0017.jpg>

<IMG_0020.jpg>

Re:

I need your partnership in a business transaction of $18.2m USD

Regards

Young Chang

Fwd: Who funds Indian Media - Very informative article..

=========================================================================================================

NDTV 
A very popular TV news media is funded by Gospels of Charity in Spain Supports Communism. Recently it has developed a soft corner towards Pakistan because Pakistan President has allowed only this channel to be aired in Pakistan. Indian CEO Prannoy Roy is co-brother of Prakash Karat, General Secretary of the Communist party of India. His wife and Brinda Karat are sisters.

INDIA TODAY
Which used to be the only national weekly which supported BJP is now bought by NDTV!! Since then the tone has changed drastically and turned into Hindu bashing.

CNN-IBN
This is 100 percent funded by Southern Baptist Church with its branches in all over the world with HQ in US.. The Church annually allocates $800 million for promotion of its channel. Its Indian head is Rajdeep Sardesai and his wife Sagarika Ghosh.

TIMES GROUP
Times Of India, Mid-Day, Nav-Bharth Times, Femina, Filmfare, Vijaya Karnataka, Times now (24- hour news channel) and many more...
Times Group is owned by Bennett & Coleman. 'World Christian Council does 80 percent of the Funding, and an Englishman and an Italian equally share balance 20 percent. The Italian Robertio Mindo is a close relative of Sonia Gandhi. 

Star TV
It is run by an Australian, who is supported by St. Peters Pontifical Church Melbourne.

Hindustan Times 
Owned by Birla Group, but hands have changed since Shobana Bhartiya took over. Presently it is working in Collaboration with Times Group.

The Hindu 
English daily, started over 125 years has been recently taken over by Joshua Society, Berne, Switzerland. N. Ram's wife is a Swiss national.

Indian Express
Divided into two groups. The Indian Express and the New Indian Express (southern edition) ACTS Christian Ministries have major stake in the Indian Express and latter is still with the Indian counterpart.

The Statesman
It is controlled by Communist Party of India.

Asian Age and Deccan Chronicle 
Is owned by a Saudi Arabian Company with its chief Editor M.J. Akbar. Gujarat riots which took place in 2002 where Hindus were burnt alive. Rajdeep Sardesai and Bharkha Dutt working for NDTV at that time got around 5 Million Dollars from Saudi Arabia to cover only Muslim victims, which they did very faithfully... Not a single Hindu family was interviewed or shown on TV whose near and dear ones had been burnt alive, it is reported.

Tarun Tejpal of Tehelka.com
Gets regular blank cheques from Arab countries to target BJP and Hindus only, it is said. The ownership explains the control of media in India by foreigners. The result is obvious.





http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/20...-media-in.html

Source: http://www.indiandefence.com/forums/national-politics/2449-who-funds-indian-media.html#ixzz2TvrJKhE7
==============================================================

Your Friend wants you to check out this video on Roxwel

Keep Rockin'—add roxwel@roxwel-mail.com to your address book. Paulina Wilson thinks you'd like this video on Roxwel.com. Paulina Wilson says: My name is Paulina Wilson. I am writing this mail to call for your collaboration in a partnership business in your country, I have some money which i will like to invest in your country in profitable business under your control as my business manager.I am sorry for contacting you through this medium without a previous notice, I had to use email to communicate with you because it is an official and more confidential way of making contact with people around the world.Note if I receive a positive response and proper reply showing your interest in this business relation, I will furnish you all relevant information that will facilitate this business investment. I know this means of communication may not be morally right to you as a person but I also have had a great thought about it and I have come to this conclusion which I am about to share with you.I will advise you to reply me through this my private email at (paulina_wwilson@ymail.com) for more details about me and this business. Yours faithfully Ms. Paulina Wilson Private Email: paulina_wwilson@ymail.com Ill of Day - Nameless Soulless

You are receiving this email because a friend has sent you a message from Roxwel.com. If for some reason, you no longer would like to receive emails from Roxwel.com, send a blank email to: unsub-ldjwqqwwkwkwrkqmwnwrsmshndkgmnkldlmjfkwhlhpskjzdwfkw@roxwel-email.com Or write to: Blastro Networks 609 W. 18th St. #C Austin, TX 78701 Click here to review our Privacy Policy.

Fwd: how the Indian foreign minister is lending China a helping hand

 

Former Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal's op-ed on how the Indian foreign minister is lending China a helping hand-

While diplomacy is important it is vital that India does not bow to the dragon

"Why this reluctance to address the root of the problem and easy satisfaction that the immediate problem has gone away?"

"All these statements imply that India can live with Chinese border intrusions, that they convey no political message to India, that the public anguish at home can be disregarded as exaggerated, and that such incursions will not be allowed to disrupt the growing relationship with China so long as they get resolved through established mechanisms in time for high level visits."

"India is being constrained to adjust itself to the realities on the ground that are to its disadvantage.

The talk of a new "defence cooperation agreement" on the border serves this Chinese objective that it has apparently sought to advance by the Ladakh intrusion."

By Kanwal Sibal

PUBLISHED: 23:04 GMT, 13 May 2013 | UPDATED: 23:04 GMT, 13 May 2013

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/article-2323927/While-diplomacy-important-vital-India-does-bow-dragon.html#ixzz2TGE44lVt

Our statements on the recent India-China face-off in Ladakh continue to confound.

One would have thought that we would have analysed the incident in depth, tried to figure out China's motivations in staging it just before external affairs minister Salman Khurshid's visit to China and that of Chinese Premier Le Keqiang's to India, and examined if it was another instance of Beijing's increased assertiveness on territorial issues rather than a reaction to any specific activity by India.

The several flag meetings with the Chinese military, the diplomatic demarches made at the foreign secretary/ambassadorial level, and the close consultations between diplomats in charge of the new joint border management mechanism would normally have given us some clues.

On his recent visit to China external affairs minister Salman Khurshid (left) met with Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (right) in Beijing and insisted he was not looking to 'apportion blame' over the Ladakh border dispute

The preparatory work for our minister's Beijing visit should have involved a comprehensive internal analysis of why the Ladakh face-off occurred and produced a brief for frank discussions with the Chinese leadership on the subject.

Intrusion

But the government's handling of the issue has been curiously different.

On arrival at Beijing Khurshid, astonishingly, told the Indian journalists that it was not clear why the incident happened and that the Chinese "were not offering us that background and we were not looking for (it)",

adding gratuitously that "actually, we are not even ready with our own analysis", suggesting he came unprepared on this vital agenda point.

In talking to Chinese journalists he implied that the need was not to end such incidents altogether but resolve them "much quicker".

 Oddly, he thought it was "not very helpful at this stage to apportion blame between them and us (as) it will only take away from the sense of relief and satisfaction that it was resolved in time".

According to him, the apple cart of what is going on with China is far more important and should not be upset, which suggests China had not done any upsetting with the Ladakh incident.

On return, Khurshid has reaffirmed that "we did not do any post-mortem or apportion blame" on the Chinese intrusion and that he was satisfied that the mechanisms worked well to resolve the stand-off.

This timidity towards China, to the point of fearing to raise a contentious issue and implicitly accepting part of the blame for the incident, seems more a pathology than an exercise in diplomacy.

An aerial view of five tents erected by Chinese troops inside Indian territory in Ladakh

Holding ground: Chinese troops hold a banner reading, "You've crossed the border, please go back" in Ladakh during the three-week stand off over the disputed border

 

For the government, the Chinese action in Ladakh seems to be of secondary importance; what is "more important is that the issue got resolved in a timely manner and within the laid down mechanism".

Why this reluctance to address the root of the problem and easy satisfaction that the immediate problem has gone away? In the context of premier Le Keqiang's visit the minister has added that "there are no prickly issues, issues of major differences which can be seen as obstacles".

Is the border issue no longer a "prickly issue" or a "major difference" between the two countries? All these statements imply that India can live with Chinese border intrusions, that they convey no political message to India, that the public anguish at home can be disregarded as exaggerated, and that such incursions will not be allowed to disrupt the growing relationship with China so long as they get resolved through established mechanisms in time for high level visits.

Strategy: Army Chief General Bikram Singh and defence secretary Shashikant Sharma discuss diplomatic solutions outside the Prime Minister's residence during the security meetings in the run up to the border settlement

Why we must bend so much before China is quite incomprehensible. We forget that ever since it became our direct neighbour by militarily occupying Tibet, China poses an enormous strategic challenge to us. It already occupies large tracts of our territory.

The issue is not any attempt by us to evict China from such territory, it is the legitimacy of our defensive measures to prevent China from advancing further south, either through additional territorial claims as in Arunachal Pradesh or by claiming control of terrain beyond its existing military positions over which India too claims control.

Unstable

There is no actual agreed line of actual control (LAC) on the ground; each side has its own perception of where it lies.

Such a situation is inherently unstable. China prefers agreements to maintain peace and tranquillity on the border without formally settling it because such agreements allow it to maintain its territorial demands on India and improve the military infrastructure on its side, even as they impose restraints on India to actively challenge China and open it to accusations of a provocative "forward policy" if it seeks to belatedly improve its defensive positions on the ground.

India is being constrained to adjust itself to the realities on the ground that are to its disadvantage.

The talk of a new "defence cooperation agreement" on the border serves this Chinese objective that it has apparently sought to advance by the Ladakh intrusion.

Strategy

While diplomatic niceties are part of political visits, one has to be careful about the import of statements and how they will be construed by our other partners.

Khurshid would have us believe that, "Both in historical terms and in terms of potential that there is for collaboration between us, we cannot think of more important country at this point of time and we are pleased that this is recognised mutually".

Really? It seems China is no longer a strategic adversary. Even as China is raising the temperature of its relations with several of its other neighbours in the east, we seem to believe that China has altogether higher stakes in its relationship with us.

This would explain why we believe that "China is willing to make concerted efforts with India... and promote the strategic cooperative partnership to a new level".

While we cannot ignore China as a powerful reality that has to be engaged, we certainly can ignore such self-serving, empty Chinese rhetoric.